0 Comments
Correspondingly, the maximum base value a character can achieve is 127. However, as the attributes are stored in signed bytes, it ranges from -128 to 127.
Therefore, Algerians believed technological gadgets, like radios and television, symbolized French colonial rule. They also detested technology because they perceived its adoption as a way of embracing colonial ideas. For example, they never adopted the French language because it would bind them to the linguistic framework of colonial ideologies. Unlike other colonial resistance movements that have used violence, as a way to stop colonial dominance, the Algerian anti-colonial movement presents an interesting support for violence because it not only opposes undesirable aspects of colonial governance, but also any ideas that were beneficial to the country as well.Īlgerians detested all aspects of colonialism because they understood that the costs of adopting partial colonial ideals were too high to their sovereignty (Hoppe and Nicholls 20). This question informs why some researchers supported violence, as the only way for countries to resist colonial oppression (Sefa and Simmons 96). While some researchers criticize violence as a means for ending colonial aggression, Sefa and Simmons (96) question why some people judge the support for violence when French colonialists also used violence to colonize Algeria. Algeria’s colonial history demonstrates the use of violence to end colonialism because Fanon (309) supported the country’s nationalist movement. Many comparisons show the existence of these principles in Algeria’s colonial history. Many historians understand the call for violent means to end colonial aggression from a historical point of view. Particularly, this paper pays a close attention to the Algerian national liberation movement as a product of violent campaigns against colonialism. This paper argues that the support for violence during the ouster of colonial rule influenced national liberation movements in many parts of the world. Through this assertion, Fanon (35) justified violent means to end colonial aggression because he believed colonialism did not improve the lives of the colonized people. From this assertion, Fanon (35) said, “National liberation, national Renaissance, the restoration of nationhood to the people, commonwealth, and whatever headings, or the new formulas, introduced in anti-colonialism, decolonization is always a violent phenomenon” (Fanon 35). Through the same lens of analysis, Wretched of the Earth explores the influences of race, class, and culture on the colonial domination of vulnerable societies.Ī key hallmark of the teachings of Fanon (35) was the support for violence, as a way to end colonial dominance. The oppressive nature of colonial rule shows that the practice was a self-destructive concept because it undermined its subjects through harassment, intimidation, and exploitation. They therefore justified their oppressive rule, as a way for bringing “light” to “dark” and uninformed people. To affirm this statement, he said, “Decolonization is the meeting of two forces, opposed to each other by their very nature, which in fact owe their originality to that sort of sub-stantification which results from and is nourished by the situation of the colonies” (Fanon 36)įanon (236) believed that most colonial powers perceived their subjects as inferior people. One society comprised of the colonizers, while the other society comprised of the colonized. In the book, Fanon (36) said colonization resulted in the creation of two polarized societies. He said, “National liberation, national renaissance, the restoration of nationhood to the people, commonwealth: whatever may be the headings used or the new formulas introduced, decolonization is always a violent phenomenon” (Fanon 35). His book ( Wretched of the Earth) was his most celebrated work, as it explored the violent nature of nationalistic movements. His works mainly centered on understanding the psychopathology that most colonial powers used to demean their subjects. Fanon (37) is a celebrated political radical, who supported the use of violence to end colonial aggression. Many countries used violence to end colonial rule. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |